This book is a product of the Survey of Mathematics and Science Opportunities (SMSO). The original mission of the SMSO was "…to develop a theoretical model of the educational experiences provided students and to develop a comprehensive battery of survey instruments addressing student, teacher, school, and curriculum factors. These would be used to inform the explanation and understanding of cross-national differences in student achievement in the anticipated Third International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). This development research was conducted in a subset of six nations participating in TIMSS" (p. ix).
The text describes the creation of a research method and the development of instruments used to conduct this cross-national education study. During the years of 1991- 1993, over 120 classroom observations were conducted in France, Japan, Norway, Spain, Switzerland, and the United States. These focused on nine year-olds and thirteen year-olds in both science and mathematics classrooms.
Part I of the text describes the development process used to create the protocols and instruments used in the investigation, beginning with a description of the collaboration process between the six countries needed to reach consensus on a common language to discuss education. The authors focus on a comparison of curriculum frameworks and textbooks in addition to an analysis of factors that guide activities in the classroom. They also detail the development of the survey instruments used in the TIMSS study. Finally, the authors draw all the components of the study together to present some conclusions and recommendations for interpreting the results for various comparisons of student achievement.
Part II consists of case studies from each of the focus countries. These provide a comprehensive picture of the content and pedagogy found in the classrooms through descriptions of the educational processes observed. Appendices include the TIMSS curriculum frameworks and the SMSO research report series index.
In some ways, this study is about cultural differences in educational settings. However, it specifically relates to national differences in characteristic pedagogical flow by showing how people in different nations carry out education in very different ways. For example, it shows the highly formalized instructional practices of French and Japanese schools and contrasts it with the open and fluid variations in Norway, Switzerland, and the United States. In each of these cases, the instructional needs of students are addressed in quite different ways with differing results.